And so, I think it serves two purposes. One is that for the existing guidelines, which is very abstract like the EU AI ACT, it’s quite abstract actually, when it mentions things that can be operationalized like integrity or accuracy or harm or privacy or whatever, this is like an instant jury that can help us adjudicate what these words really mean in the here and now. And second, for the kind of harms that we don’t have a good clue yet, then that’s another discovery process right there so we can use this is as a horizons timing tool.