I think CIP, with the triangle, already sees safety and progress, is already kind of marrying that, with the glitchy remarks and everything. So CIP’s main strategy has always been to take this side as granted. But then saying that there are ways for participation to make evals, redshaming, everything even better. So for training participation, not as a proliferation, as a safety hazard or a progress hazard, but rather as something that adds to it.