Okay, this is my short brief and slide.

All the international companies at the meeting agreed that AI needs to be trustworthy, accurate, and safe. They mentioned that their teams are constantly testing and adjusting their models to meet the expectations of reliable AI systems. When the moda invited to promote and provide their development language model to ...

As we held the meeting by inviting Google, Meta, Microsoft, and OpenAI, we set two topics to ask them following and we have made some progress. So, this is the conference about April 7th. There are two main concerns regarding the analysis and identification of AI generative contents on large ...

When it comes to the issue of monitoring and regulation AI harms, citizens hope to have more involvement in driving AI-related policies and regulations. They also expect major social media platforms like Facebook or Instagram to be able to analyze and identify deceptive content. At the same time, they also ...

Following the exchanges and discussions on the four main areas, 10 interdisciplinary academics and experts in information science, AI law, humanities, social sciences, communications technology and computational linguistics shared ideas and opinions about issues concerning the public. After a half-day discussion, the following outcomes will determine on three consensus. These ...

So, this side shows the online deliberative platforms. We use Stanford’s online platform and we host group discussions with 10 people in each group. Each group will be led by an AI robot serving as the table head to facilitate topic discussions.

Session 1 topics include AI how to analyze emergency and regulation should be strengthened from industries or government. Session 2 topics include social platform how to use AI to maintain information integrity and AI how to better maintain information integrity standards. We want to let citizens’ think and discuss how ...

So, this is our discussion topic. It is about utilizing AI to enhance information integrity. The online deliberative meeting will be divided into two sessions, discussing four topics.

So, this is the detailed process of the collaborative assembly. We send 200,000 short message services with surveys to citizens and select a sample of at least 400 participants from those willing to respond. This selection will be based on a stratified random sampling, considering variables such as residence, place, ...

So, it’s a global declaration on information integrity online. Integrity refers to ensuring that information maintains accuracy and consistency throughout its lifecycle, including storage, processing, and transmission, to guarantee that information remains reliable and accurate at all times. In the context of generative AI, information integrity involves creating an information ...

And the next topic is about alignment assembly. We are dedicated to promoting trustworthy AI. Last year, we became a partner in the international non-governmental organization called Collective Intelligence Project (CIP) to collaborate with global organizations in providing the public with more convenient and reliable AI system. Additionally, in the ...

AI Evaluation Center, we are progressively developing different kinds of evaluation for object detection models, audio classification models, images generation models, and the multi-modal models. Additionally, we plan to exchange AI evaluation techniques and standards and laws with international organizations through seminars, experts exchange and similar activities, any tool established ...

So, this is just one very short example. So, all of you, of course, have your AI models and some of them have like multi-turn conversation capabilities. And so, by offering us either API endpoints, some of you have research or the assessment program that can evaluate before deployment is ...

Now, as for the items to be assessed, we basically took a union of the NICS and the ISO and the EU and also some of the Mitre Atlas to ensure that we can automatically evaluate those pictured on the left with bright green, bright blue, ones that can be ...

What we are meeting today is determined by the steering committee guiding the AI evaluation center. Make sure that we specify the evil or evaluation systems for an evaluation institution, which will also guide the development of the tools based on those assessments items for the AI evaluation tool development ...

Now, as you may also know, in addition to more than 300 startups with more than 10,000 employees. And this only counting the ones which will rank AI applications, most make downstream or was already powered by them. Now, we see this as the foundation of our AI evaluation and ...

And the next page, based on strength AI chip and hardware in Taiwan, coordinate with powerful international generative AI-based platform, like ChatGPT and the Copilot. We are also promoting more startups, small and medium-sized companies to develop AI tools and software for various industries now that can help industries improve ...

Okay. And as you know, Taiwan needs an AI ecosystem. You can see the talent cultivation, the technology, and the investments. And all of these are a part of the work of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, as well as the administration for digital industries. But underneath all of this ...

Okay. I will make a show with attention, and I will share my screen. Can you see the screen about the slides?

Yes, okay.

Okay, he is my colleague from NICS.

Can you hear me? Okay. I’m Timmy Lin, and I work as a section chief for moda. And I’m responsible for AI application and development. We established AI evaluation center recently, and we held democracy deliberation, the deliberative assembly on March 23. And we held a meeting and discussed about ...