How are you using digital tools to deal with those really fundamental policy issues and really complex policy issues? My sense is that that’s where digital gets strained. I’ll be really interested to hear your response on that.

The related structural question is, the kind of examples you’ve been given, I would talk of, they’re difficult, but they are relatively simple policy issues like the straws, like Uber. What about things like dealing with the climate emergency, dealing with the existential questions of Taiwan and Chinese relationships, or ...

I’m thinking, particularly having used Pol.is myself, it’s not quite clear to the user how these different decisions are being made about who goes in which groups and things like that. I’m really interested in your questions about how do you ensure democratic oversight of these algorithms, of associative intelligence?

The first is around the governance assistive intelligence, as you call it. I like that term, or algorithmic governance. There’s a lot of concerns particularly in the UK, and particularly because of a couple of policy disasters, about the way in which algorithms can reinforce differentials, and this question about ...

I think clearly, we don’t have that failure culture, which is one of the real problems here. Taiwan is to be highly widely acclaimed if that kind of culture is available. It’s certainly not in the UK at the moment. I have a couple of questions which are related to ...

It’s not that early. Welcome, everybody. Hello.