I was in Hong Kong in those days.
Maybe you are in a certain spot, a specific area, or have good information, but you cannot go over a...
Our discussion is exactly on that, on how we can get attention and try to contribute...
We understood that also from your perspective, the fact of offering for free tempting things, although these tempting things included a responsibility, a duty of transparency, they continue to be attractive.
Of course, we are trying to imagine what kind of things EMPATIA can offer. It’s attractive because it’s for free, but at the same time, obliged to a larger level of transparency, of responsiveness by the institution than what exists now?
Without your system, it wouldn’t have happened?
That was because you were there to help him with this?
That means that he’s strengthening his weak political position through a program that was matching transparency, civic training, in order to create precondition to have a society that could support externally the lack of political support into him?
In iPhones.
So the main issue is it is a multi-level readability. You can adapt to the culture of the reader, different level of understanding?
Ah, OK.
Icelands?
Business trips.
You can choose several things that you can use to calculate, can you choose here or the iPhone 5 the only option?
It’s food.
Calculate it in iPhone 5.
They did an experiment and now it’s a three meters long poster that I have also at home, which is very interesting. It was an experiment of marketing but it became the only way for the member of parliament to understand the budget.
In the United States, I don’t know if you know. There is a thing called debt-in-taxes, which has been done by a marketing agency. There was a representation of the American budget, which is in the studio of each one of the members of parliament because it is the only ...
The areas are organized by areas with cuts and area with...
The pink is the cuts?
No food, no hacking.
So, “Trust us. Trust us, and don’t criticize.”
...our things, our specific things.
We continue after the break. The floor is yours. If you need more water, I have it.
You have the same age, more or less, ’81.
What they are saying.
For us, it’s more...
I think it’s 5:30. I think, maximum, 6:00. Vanessa, for example, it’s snowing in her village, so she has to go before the snow cover. The majority of us, we can stay here. It’s just to learn some, and I think the next slide is on the budget?
Just espresso?
Eh?
Do you need coffee or something?
What are we doing? Do you want to have a break?
That happens within the agency. It’s called flag searching.
Was it a useful function, or?
It is not the project that was born inside the hackathon?
Yes.
Do you think that others also use “we?” You feel a strong identification with those principles. Do you think that this is spread around, so you all behave in the same way?
My question was different. You often say “we,” and so, I was trying to understand the “we” you say, what is referred to. Now, you are talking about something which is a space of encounter, and not a movement. When you say “we,” you talk about what exactly?
I’m curious of one thing.
Free markets.
Sort of markets of talents?
If you think there are too many engineers in that area or too many cook in that area, you can move not for feeling or not a tease in the group, but because you think that the group is too homogeneous.
The second issue is that normally Open Space Technology have the Two Feet Law. That means that if you cannot contribute to a self-organized group, you go away in the next one. Here, you can see what kind of people there is there.
For example, membership of an association of shopkeeper, trade unions, and all that. In order that when they speak, when they talk in public, people know from what position they are speaking, if they have one.
This idea of the stickers have two issues that could interesting for us. The first one is that in some parts of Germany, people has stickers to declare their belonging to lobbies or potential...
You rely on low instincts of man?
While in the previous thing you show us, you created new data. For example, in Nepal. In this case, the data source was not put into that. You were accepting the data, and just helping them to be more clear and visible?
The data were the same, where exactly by the same source?
You can customize the visual?
There were, for example, cases in which you could show that there were, for example, no direct relation between the funding and what they had done. Did someone emerge as particularly honest or not, involved within...
